GrammarBlog

Monday, 16 June 2008

Electronic'S - R - US

img src="http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/z_images/banners/v2launch.gif" border="0" title="We've moved to www.grammarblog.co.uk" alt="We've moved to www.grammarblog.co.uk" />

This is a horror show of a sign.

It always irks me how "toysRus" turned a repugnantly illiterate phrase into a brand name, so I obviously hate to see it copied. When combined with apostrophe abuse, this causes my eyelid to twitch à la the captain from Police Academy.


I post this in the knowledge that fellow GrammarBlogger Tom (should we begin to employ GrammarBlog as a surname when referring to a member of our fraternity?) will be horrified at yet another unwise application of the Bank Gothic typeface.

Labels: , , , , , ,

Friday, 22 February 2008

Wet your appetite

img src="http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/z_images/banners/v2launch.gif" border="0" title="We've moved to www.grammarblog.co.uk" alt="We've moved to www.grammarblog.co.uk" />

I can't decide if this is a typo or a malapropism. Either way it's a shocker.


The correct word is of course 'whet'.

Labels: , , , ,

Thursday, 10 January 2008

Through and Thru

img src="http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/z_images/banners/v2launch.gif" border="0" title="We've moved to www.grammarblog.co.uk" alt="We've moved to www.grammarblog.co.uk" />

Is anyone else really sick of seeing the word 'Thru'? Of all the various inane marketing spellings it's the one that winds me up the most. I'm not sure why. Maybe ubiquity is a factor; it does seem to crop up everywhere.

The Grammar Vandal currently has a poll on her site asking visitors their opinion on when it is acceptable to use 'thru'.

I'm on team Never.

Related posts: Grammar abuse in signage: part 9

Labels: , , ,

Wednesday, 9 January 2008

P-p-p pick up a punctuation guide

img src="http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/z_images/banners/v2launch.gif" border="0" title="We've moved to www.grammarblog.co.uk" alt="We've moved to www.grammarblog.co.uk" />

Izzy was less than impressed when she noticed an error on the wrapper of her P-p-p-penguin.



What do Penguin's have for lunch?
"What do Penguin's have for lunch?"

I was about to eat this scrummy-looking Penguin bar when I noticed that there was a mistake. The answer, by the way, is 'Iceburg-ers'. Needless to say, this Penguin bar is about to be sent back to the company with a complaint.
In addition to the apostrophe abuse, the capital 'P' suggests that Penguin bars are coming to life and eating things.
Izzy did not specify whether the nature of her complaint would be regarding punctuation or pun quality. I hope she gives them hell on both counts.

Labels: , , , , ,

Thursday, 3 January 2008

More or less?

img src="http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/z_images/banners/v2launch.gif" border="0" title="We've moved to www.grammarblog.co.uk" alt="We've moved to www.grammarblog.co.uk" />

Martin has been in touch by email to submit this wonderful example of a shop getting it completely wrong.



More than Half Price

Martin writes,
Even a major national chain can get it wrong, the attached is in the window of the local W. H. Smith store.
My maths isn't great but I know that buying something at more than half price isn't necessarily a good deal.

Labels: , ,

Thursday, 6 December 2007

Ski's, boots and goggles

img src="http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/z_images/banners/v2launch.gif" border="0" title="We've moved to www.grammarblog.co.uk" alt="We've moved to www.grammarblog.co.uk" />

Ade is the name of the loyal grammar soldier who submitted this picture of a renegade apostrophe.


Ade writes:
I spotted thi's s'hocker the other day while I wa's on the tube:
skis_ad

Take a closer look at that second line of copy. Why is there no capital letter at the start of the sentence? They must have filled their capital quota with "Travel  Insurance".

Labels: , ,

Tuesday, 6 November 2007

Grammar abuse in signage - part 9

img src="http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/z_images/banners/v2launch.gif" border="0" title="We've moved to www.grammarblog.co.uk" alt="We've moved to www.grammarblog.co.uk" />

"Brew" Ridge, originally uploaded by DiegoLuego.

This one has everything.


Unnecessary quotation marks? Check.
Irritating marketing spelling (thru)? Check.
Apostrophe abuse? Check.
Unnecessary capitalisation? Check.
Spelling error? Check.

Heaven preserve us.

Labels: , , , , , , , , ,

Wednesday, 5 September 2007

Madrid: Rid Mad Commas Please,

img src="http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/z_images/banners/v2launch.gif" border="0" title="We've moved to www.grammarblog.co.uk" alt="We've moved to www.grammarblog.co.uk" />
This is the front of a high street fashion shop on the Gran Via, Madrid:


The title amused me enough, the erroneous comma even more so. Add in the lower case ‘l’ at the start, and you have yourself a classic example of the fact that no matter what their nationality, marketeers go about their work with all the delicacy of a drunk French chauffeur in a Parisian tunnel.

Were only lefties allowed in? Does Arthur Scargill buy his slacks here?

So many questions.

Labels: , , , , , ,

Saturday, 11 August 2007

A Positive Connection?

img src="http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/z_images/banners/v2launch.gif" border="0" title="We've moved to www.grammarblog.co.uk" alt="We've moved to www.grammarblog.co.uk" />

I hate it when instructions aren't clear. If a product manufacturer or a service provider has a limited number of words with which to instruct a customer, those words should be chosen carefully. Unlike this example from a London underground ticket machine.


...until you feel a positive connection.
What the hell is that supposed to mean? Is it referring to an emotional or spiritual connection? How much does Ken Livingstone expect me to feel for his overcrowded, sweaty, inefficient transport system?

Labels: , ,

Monday, 6 August 2007

OK film, crap punctuation.

img src="http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/z_images/banners/v2launch.gif" border="0" title="We've moved to www.grammarblog.co.uk" alt="We've moved to www.grammarblog.co.uk" />
British comedy at it's best
I watched this DVD at the weekend and my girlfriend spotted the rogue apostrophe on the cover (I was a little hungover or else I would have spotted it myself). I don't know whether to blame Now magazine for writing it or Fox entertainment for including it on the packaging of their DVD. Either way this was approved (assuming one editor at each company) by at least 4 people who write for a living.

So, to Now magazine and Fox, I'm sending you a warning: next time it's The List. Is that what you want? Because that's what'll happen.

The film was OK.

Labels: , , ,

Soviet virgin lands short of goal again

img src="http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/z_images/banners/v2launch.gif" border="0" title="We've moved to www.grammarblog.co.uk" alt="We've moved to www.grammarblog.co.uk" />

I have a love/hate relationship with crappy ambiguous marketing copy. I love it because it's useful for duping the masses; I hate it because it's used for duping the masses. I love it when you read a snappy phrase that sounds great; I hate it because it doesn't mean anything. I love it because when it's done badly the results can be hilarious.


Take this list of ambiguous newspaper headlines for instance. My personal favourites are listed below.

Children's Stool Great for Use in Garden
Brings the rhubarb up a treat.

Drunk Gets Nine Months in Violin Case

Iraqi Head Seeks Arms
What an image!

Reagan Wins On Budget, But More Lies Ahead

Police begin campaign to run down jaywalkers
Brutally ironic justice.

Prostitutes appeal to Pope
At least he's honest.

Panda mating fails; Veterinarian takes over
That's dedication.

Soviet virgin lands short of goal again
She's trying her hardest.

Enraged cow injures farmer with ax

Plane too close to ground, crash probe told
Stating the bleeding obvious.

Miners refuse to work after death
Union power gone mad.

Never withhold herpes infection from loved one
Nice.

Labels: , , ,

Friday, 6 July 2007

Warning: bad grammar may cause increased levels of honesty

img src="http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/z_images/banners/v2launch.gif" border="0" title="We've moved to www.grammarblog.co.uk" alt="We've moved to www.grammarblog.co.uk" />

Words are important. Words are powerful. Choose the wrong words and although you are trying to convey one particular meaning, you may inadvertently convey another.


This is especially true and damaging when considering a sales pitch. With a sales pitch you are trying to persuade people to part with money in exchange for something you are offering.


This doesn't just happen, the process guides the potential customer through a series of consecutive impulses from first contact through to sale. If you screw up when trying to engender any of these impulses through inaccuracy or stupidity, it's hard to get back on track.

The most important step (along with the close) is the first contact. Which brings me to my point, I found a very good example of why one should check website copy very carefully.
Website solutions should always be custom made for a client. Here at ICBusiness we listen to your requirements BEFORE trying to sell you something you do not need.
How very honest. They'll listen to you - and then try to sell you something you don't need.

Can't fault them for trying.

Labels: , ,

Thursday, 17 May 2007

Single Breasted Womens Jackets

img src="http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/z_images/banners/v2launch.gif" border="0" title="We've moved to www.grammarblog.co.uk" alt="We've moved to www.grammarblog.co.uk" />
Recently spotted in my MD's artwork presentation to a potential client:
Single Breasted Womens Jackets
Admittedly, fashion marketing isn't my area of expertise but I wouldn't have thought there are enough single breasted women to create the demand for such an item. In addition there is a possessive apostrophe missing (grrrr).

Note: The plural of woman is "women". There is no plural of women so "womens" is never a word.

Technically, the header should have read:
Single-breasted, Women's Jackets
I resisted the urge to suggest that it should be changed, partly because I don't want to appear anal and smug (unlike certain other GrammarBloggers) and partly because I suspected I would be overruled in the name of style.

The layout for this presentation was clean and uncluttered and the header would have admittedly lost some of its stylistic value if it had been interrupted with all that pesky punctuation.

So does that mean the laws of punctuation can be ignored in this case? Not under my hard-line dictatorship, that's for damn sure! Any arty types dropping apostrophes willy-nilly had better be prepared for the thumbscrews.

Leniency will be shown with regards to hyphens, they can be optional.

Labels: , , ,

Subscribe to Posts [Atom]

GrammarBlog has moved

We are now live at http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/

Contact us

If you want to tell us your pet peeves, send us examples of grammar abuse you have witnessed or even ask our advice on grammar matters, we'd love to hear from you. Email us on

GrammarBlog Shorts


It's not just you

Pictures

www.flickr.com
photos in Grammar Bloopers More photos in Grammar Bloopers

Powered by FeedBurner

Observational Humor Blogs - BlogCatalog Blog Directory

Add to Technorati Favorites

Join My Community at MyBloglog!

British Blog Directory.

blogarama - the blog directory

Blog Directory - Blogged