Tuesday, 9 October 2007
Putting Middlesborough on the Map
img src="http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/z_images/banners/v2launch.gif" border="0" title="We've moved to www.grammarblog.co.uk" alt="We've moved to www.grammarblog.co.uk" />
Fans of GrammarBlog (stop laughing at the back) will be familiar with the ubiquitous misspelling of ‘Middlesbrough’.
This is a particularly brilliant example, found today on Premier Travel Inn’s website:
Did the cartographer think there were places called ‘Middlesbrough’ and ‘Middlesborough’ right next to each other?
Elsewhere, when a customer wishing to stay on Teesside reaches the Booking Summary page, Premier Travel Inn employ the 12-character abbreviation ‘Midd’borough’.
This is like abbreviating abbreviation to abrvv’ation: not only have they saved just one character, they have also introduced a completely erroneous additional letter.
Makes. Me. Mad.
This is a particularly brilliant example, found today on Premier Travel Inn’s website:
Did the cartographer think there were places called ‘Middlesbrough’ and ‘Middlesborough’ right next to each other?
Elsewhere, when a customer wishing to stay on Teesside reaches the Booking Summary page, Premier Travel Inn employ the 12-character abbreviation ‘Midd’borough’.
This is like abbreviating abbreviation to abrvv’ation: not only have they saved just one character, they have also introduced a completely erroneous additional letter.
Makes. Me. Mad.
Labels: middlesbrough, spelling, The List
posted by Dan at 3:19 pm
11 Comments
Wednesday, 12 September 2007
"Middlesborough's" Guardian Angels
img src="http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/z_images/banners/v2launch.gif" border="0" title="We've moved to www.grammarblog.co.uk" alt="We've moved to www.grammarblog.co.uk" />
A few years ago, I wrote an article in a football fanzine about the media’s infuriating practice of inserting a second ‘o’ in the word ‘Middlesbrough’, making ‘Middlesborough’.
In their ‘irreverent’ ‘Football Diary’ section the next week, The Guardian newspaper made satirical mention of the piece. This was sumptuously ironic as they were, and still are, by far the most frequent culprits of this crime against spelling, sense, atlases (oh how I wish the plural were ‘atlai’) and encyclopaedias (ditto ‘encyclopaedi’, although that does sound a bit like a trendy name for the Sex Offenders’ Register).
Further, the region Middlesbrough is located in often appears as ‘Teeside’ (it is ‘Teesside’, as in beside the River Tees). I have written to the Guardian on several occasions in the last year alone on both counts, but replies there have come none, to use an incredibly irritating current linguistic style (see “up with that they will not put”).
Today, though, the sub-editors of the newspaper have surpassed themselves.
The letters page in the Sports section carries missives directly next to each other in which BOTH spellings are used:
What a logic defying approach to sub-editing. Schizophrenic, in fact. Or, perhaps the sub-editor was a bit like a flawed character from a rubbish sitcom who couldn’t decide which ‘gal’ to take to dinner (Middlesbrough or Middlesborough?) so dated both at once, despite there being no apparent need to do so.
As if that was not enough, look at the headline above the second letter. Unless they are making a pun on that well known phrase about the pleasure of surprisingly stumbling upon a tightly braided rope, then I think, Betty, they’ve done another whoopsie.
This country.
In their ‘irreverent’ ‘Football Diary’ section the next week, The Guardian newspaper made satirical mention of the piece. This was sumptuously ironic as they were, and still are, by far the most frequent culprits of this crime against spelling, sense, atlases (oh how I wish the plural were ‘atlai’) and encyclopaedias (ditto ‘encyclopaedi’, although that does sound a bit like a trendy name for the Sex Offenders’ Register).
Further, the region Middlesbrough is located in often appears as ‘Teeside’ (it is ‘Teesside’, as in beside the River Tees). I have written to the Guardian on several occasions in the last year alone on both counts, but replies there have come none, to use an incredibly irritating current linguistic style (see “up with that they will not put”).
Today, though, the sub-editors of the newspaper have surpassed themselves.
The letters page in the Sports section carries missives directly next to each other in which BOTH spellings are used:
What a logic defying approach to sub-editing. Schizophrenic, in fact. Or, perhaps the sub-editor was a bit like a flawed character from a rubbish sitcom who couldn’t decide which ‘gal’ to take to dinner (Middlesbrough or Middlesborough?) so dated both at once, despite there being no apparent need to do so.
As if that was not enough, look at the headline above the second letter. Unless they are making a pun on that well known phrase about the pleasure of surprisingly stumbling upon a tightly braided rope, then I think, Betty, they’ve done another whoopsie.
This country.
Labels: guardian, middlesbrough, spelling
posted by Dan at 3:24 pm
9 Comments
GrammarBlog has moved
We are now live at http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/
Contact us
If you want to tell us your pet peeves, send us examples of grammar abuse you have witnessed or even ask our advice on grammar matters, we'd love to hear from you. Email us on 
Subscribe and Share
Previous Posts
Archives
Friends
- 1000 Tiny Things I Hate
- AA Gill's Times Column
- Apostrophe Abuse
- SPOGG
- Stephen Fry's blog
- The “Blog” of “Unnecessary” Quotation Marks
- Mighty Red Pen
- lowercase L
- Literally a web log
- Elisabeth Writes
- Never in all my life
- The Engine Room
- I Love Typography
- spEak You’re bRanes
- Passive Aggressive Notes
- T.E.A.L.
Enemies (aka The List)
Reading List
It's not just you
