Thursday, 6 December 2007
Grammar Abuse in Signage - Parts 12 and 13
img src="http://www.grammarblog.co.uk/z_images/banners/v2launch.gif" border="0" title="We've moved to www.grammarblog.co.uk" alt="We've moved to www.grammarblog.co.uk" />
You can exchange your vouchers for Hilton vouchers, to a princely ratio of 1:4 (£50 of Tesco vouchers becoming £200 of Hilton vouchers). The genius of my wife led her to suggest a break in Edinburgh at the Caledonian Hilton hotel; a 5-star hotel, no less. Good work.
Imagine, if you will, discovering that the 5-star rating doesn't cover basic language skills:
If you shop at Tesco you earn Clubcard vouchers. Vouchers equate to prizes in Tescoland. Yes they do.
You can exchange your vouchers for Hilton vouchers, to a princely ratio of 1:4 (£50 of Tesco vouchers becoming £200 of Hilton vouchers). The genius of my wife led her to suggest a break in Edinburgh at the Caledonian Hilton hotel; a 5-star hotel, no less. Good work.
Imagine, if you will, discovering that the 5-star rating doesn't cover basic language skills:
Two notices; multiple errors: inexcusable.
Labels: photos, randomised caps, signage, tesco
posted by Paul at 12:56 pm
Subscribe and Share
Previous Posts
Friends
- 1000 Tiny Things I Hate
- AA Gill's Times Column
- Apostrophe Abuse
- SPOGG
- Stephen Fry's blog
- The “Blog” of “Unnecessary” Quotation Marks
- Mighty Red Pen
- lowercase L
- Literally a web log
- Elisabeth Writes
- Never in all my life
- The Engine Room
- I Love Typography
- spEak You’re bRanes
- Passive Aggressive Notes
- T.E.A.L.
Enemies (aka The List)
Reading List
It's not just you
3 Comments:
I think that Some People are just Prone To hitting the Shift Key While typing, They probably Don't even Realise they are Doing It.
You're Right though; There is No excuse.
Sometimes I think Emily Dickinson has a lot to answer for.
I have worked in advertising for many years and have come to learn that oftentimes clients insist on using this type of random capitalization, usually without any kind of justification. It is quite likely that this was read by a proofreader but that the client did not want to have the changes made.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]